Can social accountability improve access to free public health care for the poor? Analysis of three Health Equity Fund configurations in Cambodia, 2015–17

Author:

Jacobs Bart12ORCID,Sam Oeun Sam3,Ir Por4,Rifkin Susan5,Van Damme Wim6

Affiliation:

1. Social Health Protection Project, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), Phnom Penh, Cambodia

2. Social Health Protection Network P4H, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

3. Buddhism for Health, National Road 1, Borey Peng Huoth, #64, St. P-10E Khan Chbar Ampov, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

4. Technical Bureau, National Institute of Public Health, lot no. 80, Samdach Penn Nouth Blvd (St. 289), Phnom Penh, Cambodia

5. Distance Learning, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 7HT, UK

6. Public Health Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium

Abstract

AbstractWithin the context of universal health coverage, community participation has been identified as instrumental to facilitate access to health services. Social accountability whereby citizens hold providers and policymakers accountable is one popular approach. This article describes one example, that of Community-Managed Health Equity Funds (CMHEFs), as an approach to community engagement in Cambodia to improve poor people’s use of their entitlement to fee-free health care at public health facilities. The objectives of this article are to describe the size of its operations and its ability to enable poor people continued access to health care. Using data collected routinely, we compare the uptake of curative health services by eligible poor people under three configurations of Health Equity Funds (HEFs) during a 24-month period (July 2015–June 2017): Standard HEF that operated without community engagement, Mature CMHEFs established years before the study period and New CMHEFs initiated just before the study period. One year within the study, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) stopped operating the HEF nationwide and only the community-participation aspects of New CMHEF continued receiving technical assistance from an NGO. Using utilization figures for curative services by non-poor people for comparison, following the cessation of HEF management by the NGOs, outpatient consultation figures declined for all three configurations in comparison with the year before but only significantly for Standard HEF. The three HEF configurations experienced a highly statistically significant reduction in monthly inpatient admissions following halting of NGO management of HEFs. This study shows that enhancing access to free health care through social accountability is optimized at health centres through engagement of a wide range of community representatives. Such effect at hospitals was only observed to a limited extent, suggesting the need for more engagement of hospital management authorities in social accountability mechanisms.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference55 articles.

1. Gaps in universal health coverage in Malawi: a qualitative study in rural communities;Abiiro;BMC Health Services Research ,2014

2. Protecting the poor? Impact of the national health equity fund on utilization of government health services in Cambodia, 2006–2013;Annear;BMJ Global Health,2019

3. Formalizing under-the-table payments to control out-of-pocket hospital expenditures in Cambodia;Barber;Health Policy and Planning,2004

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3