Geographic barriers to achieving universal health coverage: evidence from rural Madagascar

Author:

Garchitorena Andres12ORCID,Ihantamalala Felana A2,Révillion Christophe3,Cordier Laura F2,Randriamihaja Mauricianot24,Razafinjato Benedicte2,Rafenoarivamalala Feno H2,Finnegan Karen E25,Andrianirinarison Jean Claude67,Rakotonirina Julio68,Herbreteau Vincent9,Bonds Matthew H25

Affiliation:

1. MIVEGEC, University Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, 911 Avenue Agropolis, 34394 Montpellier, Montpellier, France

2. NGO PIVOT, BP23 Ranomafana, 312 Ifanadiana, Madagascar

3. Université de La Réunion, UMR 228 Espace-Dev (IRD, UA, UG, UM, UR), 40 Av De Soweto, 97410 Saint-Pierre, Réunion, France

4. School of Management and Technological innovation, University of Fianarantsoa, BP 1135 Andrainjato, 301 Fianarantsoa, Madagascar

5. Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

6. Ministry of Public Health, Ambohidahy, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar

7. National Institut of Public Health, Befelatanana, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar

8. Faculty of Medicine, BP. 375, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar

9. Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR 228 Espace-Dev (IRD, UA, UG, UM, UR), B.P. 86, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

Abstract

Abstract Poor geographic access can persist even when affordable and well-functioning health systems are in place, limiting efforts for universal health coverage (UHC). It is unclear how to balance support for health facilities and community health workers in UHC national strategies. The goal of this study was to evaluate how a health system strengthening (HSS) intervention aimed towards UHC affected the geographic access to primary care in a rural district of Madagascar. For this, we collected the fokontany of residence (lowest administrative unit) from nearly 300 000 outpatient consultations occurring in facilities of Ifanadiana district in 2014–2017 and in the subset of community sites supported by the HSS intervention. Distance from patients to facilities was accurately estimated following a full mapping of the district’s footpaths and residential areas. We modelled per capita utilization for each fokontany through interrupted time-series analyses with control groups, accounting for non-linear relationships with distance and travel time among other factors, and we predicted facility utilization across the district under a scenario with and without HSS. Finally, we compared geographic trends in primary care when combining utilization at health facilities and community sites. We find that facility-based interventions similar to those in UHC strategies achieved high utilization rates of 1–3 consultations per person year only among populations living in close proximity to facilities. We predict that scaling only facility-based HSS programmes would result in large gaps in access, with over 75% of the population unable to reach one consultation per person year. Community health delivery, available only for children under 5 years, provided major improvements in service utilization regardless of their distance from facilities, contributing to 90% of primary care consultations in remote populations. Our results reveal the geographic limits of current UHC strategies and highlight the need to invest on professionalized community health programmes with larger scopes of service.

Funder

IRD

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference65 articles.

1. National implementation of Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI): policy constraints and strategies;Ahmed;Health Policy,2010

2. Physical accessibility and utilization of health services in Yemen;Al-Taiar;International Journal ofHealthGeographics,2010

3. When do vertical (stand-alone) programmes have a place in health systems?;Atun;WHO European Ministerial Conference on Health Systems,2008

4. Using a GIS to model interventions to strengthen the emergency referral system for maternal and newborn health in Ethiopia;Bailey;International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics,2011

5. The price is wrong;Bates;Field Actions Science Reports,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3