Have lower-income groups benefited more from increased government health insurance subsidies? Benefit incidence analysis in Ningxia, China

Author:

Hu Min1ORCID,Mao Wenhui12ORCID,Xu Ruyan1,Chen Wen1ORCID,Yip Winnie3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, 138 Yixueyuan Road , Shanghai 200032, China

2. The Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, 310 Trent Drive , Durham, NC 27710, USA

3. Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Abstract

Abstract China’s government subsidies on the demand side—such as subsidizing medical insurance premiums—have accelerated progress towards universal health coverage. We examined whether the increased government subsidies had benefited the population, especially the poor. We conducted two rounds of household surveys and collected the annual claims reports of a rural medical insurance scheme in Ningxia (a relatively underdeveloped region in Western China). We used benefit incidence analysis to evaluate the distribution of benefits for different health services received by individuals with different living standards, as measured by the household wealth index. From 2009 to 2015, the benefit received per capita tripled from 101 to 332 CNY, most (>94%) of which was received for inpatient care. The overall distribution of benefits improved and became pro-poor in 2015 [the concentration index (CI) changed from −0.017 to −0.092], mainly driven by inpatient care. The poorer groups benefited disproportionately more from inpatient care from 2009 to 2015 (the CI changed from −0.013 to −0.093). County and higher-level inpatient care had the greatest improvements towards a pro-poor distribution. The distribution of subsidies for outpatient services significantly favoured the poorer groups in 2009, but less so in 2015 (CI changed from −0.093 to −0.068), and it became less pro-poor in village clinics (CI changed from −0.209 to −0.020). The increased government subsidies for the rural medical insurance scheme mainly contributed to inpatient care and allowed the poor to use more services at county and higher-level hospitals. China’s government subsidies on the demand side have contributed to equity in benefit incidence, yet there is a noticeable increasing trend in utilizing services at higher levels of providers. Our findings also indicate that outpatient services need more coverage from rural medical insurance schemes to improve equity.

Funder

China Medical Board

Shanghai Pujiang Program

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference36 articles.

1. Who benefits from healthcare spending in Cambodia? Evidence for a universal health coverage policy;Asante;Health Policy and Planning,2019

2. Equity in health care financing in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of evidence from studies using benefit and financing incidence analyses;Asante;PLoS One,2016

3. Benefit incidence analysis in public health facilities in India: utilization and benefits at the national and state levels;Bowser;International Journal for Equity in Health,2019

4. Who benefits from government healthcare subsidies? An assessment of the equity of healthcare benefits distribution in China;Chen;PLoS One,2015

5. Assessing equity in benefit distribution of government health subsidy in 2012 across East China: benefit incidence analysis;Chen;International Journal for Equity in Health,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3