Embedding Community-Based Newborn Care in the Ethiopian health system: lessons from a 4-year programme evaluation

Author:

Avan Bilal Iqbal1ORCID,Berhanu Della23,Mekonnen Yirgalem4,Beaumont Emma5,Tomlin Keith6,Allen Elizabeth5ORCID,Schellenberg Joanna2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1 7HT, UK

2. Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1 7HT, UK

3. Health System and Reproductive Health Research Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Postal code 1242, Ethiopia

4. JaRco Consulting, Addis Ababa, PO Box 43107, Ethiopia

5. Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1 7HT, UK

6. Department of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1 7HT, UK

Abstract

Abstract Despite remarkable gains, improving neonatal survival globally remains slow paced. Innovative service-delivery packages have been developed for community health workers (CHWs) to maximize system efficiency and increase the reach of services. However, embedding these in health systems needs structural and procedural alignment. The Community-Based Newborn Care (CBNC) programme was a response to high neonatal mortality in Ethiopia. Key aspects include simplified treatment for neonatal illness, integrated outreach services and task-shifting. Using the CHW functionality model by WHO, this study evaluates the health system response to the programme, including quality of care. A before-and-after study was conducted with three survey time points: baseline (November 2013), midline (December 2015) and follow-up (December 2017—4 years after the programme started). Data were collected at a sample of primary healthcare facilities from 101 districts across four regions. Analysis took two perspectives: (1) health system response, through supplies, infrastructure support and supervision, assessed through interviews and observations at health facilities and (2) quality of care, through CHWs’ theoretical capacity to deliver services, as well as their performance, assessed through functional health literacy and direct observation of young infant case management. Results showed gains in services for young infants, with antibiotics and job aids available at over 90% of health centres. However, services at health posts remained inadequate in 2017. In terms of quality of care, only 37% of CHWs correctly diagnosed key conditions in sick young infants at midline. CHWs’ functional health literacy declined by over 70% in basic aspects of case management during the study. Although the frequency of quarterly supportive supervision visits was above 80% during 2013–2017, visits lacked support for managing sick young infants. Infrastructure and resources improved over the course of the CBNC programme implementation. However, embedding and scaling up the programme lacked the systems-thinking and attention to health system building-blocks needed to optimize service delivery.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

International Development Research Centre

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference45 articles.

1. Systems thinking for strengthening health systems in LMICs: need for a paradigm shift;Adam;Health Policyand Planning,2012

2. Improving community health worker performance through supportive supervision: a randomised controlled implementation trial in Pakistan;Aftab;ActaPaediatrica,2018

3. Implementation research to support Bangladesh Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to implement its national guidelines for management of infections in young infants in two rural districts;Ahmed;Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition,2019

4. Closing the inequality gaps in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health coverage: slow and fast progressors;Amouzou;BMJGlobalHealth,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3