Political economy analysis of subnational health management in Kenya, Malawi and Uganda

Author:

Rodríguez Daniela C1ORCID,Balaji Lakshmi Narasimhan2,Chamdimba Elita3,Kafumba Juba3,Koon Adam D1ORCID,Mazalale Jacob3,Mkombe Dadirai3,Munywoki Joshua4,Mwase-Vuma Tawonga3,Namakula Justine5,Nambiar Bejoy6,Neel Abigail H1,Nsabagasani Xavier5,Paina Ligia1,Rogers Braeden7,Tsoka Maxton3,Waweru Evelyn4,Munthali Alister3,Ssengooba Freddie5,Tsofa Benjamin4

Affiliation:

1. International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

2. Health Programme, UNICEF New York , 3 UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017, USA

3. Centre for Social Research, University of Malawi , P.O. Box 280, Zomba, Malawi

4. KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme , Hospital Road, P.O. Box 230, Kilifi, Kenya

5. School of Public Health, Makerere University , New Mulago Hill Road, Mulago, Kampala, Uganda

6. UNICEF Malawi , PO Box 30375, Airtel Complex Area 40/31, Lilongwe, Malawi

7. Health Section, UNICEF Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office , United Nations Complex, Gigiri, P.O. Box 44145-00100, Nairobi, Kenya

Abstract

Abstract The need to bolster primary health care (PHC) to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets for health is well recognized. In Eastern and Southern Africa, where governments have progressively decentralized health decision-making, health management is critical to PHC performance. While investments in health management capacity are important, so is improving the environment in which managers operate. Governance arrangements, management systems and power dynamics of actors can have a significant influence on health managers’ ability to improve PHC access and quality. We conducted a problem-driven political economy analysis (PEA) in Kenya, Malawi and Uganda to explore local decision-making environments and how they affect management and governance practices for health. This PEA used document review and key informant interviews (N = 112) with government actors, development partners and civil societies in three districts or counties in each country (N = 9). We found that while decentralization should improve PHC by supporting better decisions in line with local priorities from community input, it has been accompanied by thick bureaucracy, path-dependent and underfunded budgets that result in trade-offs and unfulfilled plans, management support systems that are less aligned to local priorities, weak accountability between local government and development partners, uneven community engagement and insufficient public administration capacity to negotiate these challenges. Emergent findings suggest that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) not only resulted in greater pressures on health teams and budgets but also improved relations with central government related to better communication and flexible funding, offering some lessons. Without addressing the disconnection between the vision for decentralization and the reality of health managers mired in unhelpful processes and politics, delivering on PHC and universal health coverage goals and the SDG agenda will remain out of reach.

Funder

UNICEF

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3