The National Health Policy for people with disabilities in Brazil: an analysis of the content, context and the performance of social actors

Author:

Lyra Tereza Maciel1,Veloso de Albuquerque Maria Socorro2,Santos de Oliveira Raquel2,Morais Duarte Miranda Gabriella2,Andréa de Oliveira Márcia3,Eduarda Carvalho Maria1,Fernandes Santos Helena4,Penn-Kekana Loveday5,Kuper Hannah6

Affiliation:

1. Aggeu Magalhães Institute, FIOCRUZ/PE , Av. Professor Moraes Rego, s/n—Campus da UFPE, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE 50.740-465, Brazil

2. Center for Medical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco , Av. da Engenharia, s/n, Bloco ‘D’, 1º Andar—Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE 50.740-600, Brazil

3. Medical Sciences College, University of Pernambuco , Av. Gov. Agamenon Magalhães—Santo Amaro, Recife, PE 50.100-010, Brazil

4. Center for Philosophy and Human Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco , Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235—Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE 50670-901, Brazil

5. Epidemiology and Public Health, Maternal and Neonatal Health Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK

6. International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this article is to analyse the circumstances in which the National Health Policy for Persons with Disabilities (PNSPCD) came into place in 2002 and the factors supporting or impeding its implementation from 2002 to 2018. The analysis was based on the Comprehensive Policy Analysis Model proposed by Walt and Gilson and focussed on understanding the context, process, content and actors involved in the formulation and implementation of the Policy. Data were obtained from two sources: document analysis of the key relevant documents and seven key informant interviews. Content analysis was undertaken using the Condensation of Meanings technique. The research demonstrates that the development and implementation of PNSPCD is marked by advances and retreats, determined, above all, by national and international macro-political decisions. The policy was formulated during Fernando Henrique’s governments, under pressure from social movements and the international agenda and constituted a breakthrough for the rights of persons with disabilities. However, progress on implementation only took place under subsequent centre-left governments with the establishment of a care network for people with disabilities and a defined specific budget. These developments resulted from the mobilization of social movements, the ratification of the United Nations Convention on the rights of people with disabilities and the adherence of these governments to the human rights agenda. The coming to power of ultra-right governments triggered fiscal austerity, a setback in the implementation of the care network and a weakening in the content of various social policies related to the care of people with disabilities. During this era, the political approach changed, with the attempt to evade the role of the State, and the perspective of guaranteeing social rights. Undoubtedly, the neoliberal offensive on social policies, especially the Unified Health System, is the main obstacle to the effective implementation of the PNPCD in Brazil.

Funder

Medical Research Council

Conselho Nacional das Fundações Estaduais de Amparo à Pesquisa

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference55 articles.

1. Access to healthcare for children with Congenital Zika Syndrome in Brazil: perspectives of mothers and health professionals;Albuquerque;Health Policy and Planning,2019

2. The political organization of people with disabilities in Brazil and their demands in the educational field;Amorim;Revista Educacao Especial,2019

3. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment;Benford;Annual Review of Sociology,2000

4. Pessoas com deficiência e políticas de saúde no Brasil: reflexões bioéticas;Bernardes;Ciência & Saúde Coletiva,2009

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3