Is the routine health information system ready to support the planned national health insurance scheme in South Africa?

Author:

Nicol Edward12ORCID,Hanmer Lyn A1,Mukumbang Ferdinand C13ORCID,Basera Wisdom14,Zitho Andiswa1,Bradshaw Debbie14

Affiliation:

1. Burden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council. South Africa

2. Division of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

3. School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape

4. School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract

Abstract Implementation of a National Health Insurance (NHI) in South Africa requires a reliable, standardized health information system that supports Diagnosis-Related Groupers for reimbursements and resource management. We assessed the quality of inpatient health records, the availability of standard discharge summaries and coded clinical data and the congruence between inpatient health records and discharge summaries in public-sector hospitals to support the NHI implementation in terms of reimbursement and resource management. We undertook a cross-sectional health-records review from 45 representative public hospitals consisting of seven tertiary, 10 regional and 28 district hospitals in 10 NHI pilot districts representing all nine provinces. Data were abstracted from a randomly selected sample of 5795 inpatient health records from the surgical, medical, obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics and psychiatry departments. Quality was assessed for 10 pre-defined data elements relevant to NHI reimbursements, by comparing information in source registers, patient folders and discharge summaries for patients admitted in March and July 2015. Cohen's/Fleiss’ kappa coefficients (κ) were used to measure agreements between the sources. While 3768 (65%) of the 5795 inpatient-level records contained a discharge summary, less than 835 (15%) of diagnoses were coded using ICD-10 codes. Despite most of the records having correct patient identifiers [κ: 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91–0.93], significant inconsistencies were observed between the registers, patient folders and discharge summaries for some data elements: attending physician’s signature (κ: 0.71; 95% CI 0.67–0.75); results of the investigation (κ: 0.71; 95% CI 0.69–0.74); patient’s age (κ: 0.72; 95% CI 0.70–0.74); and discharge diagnosis (κ: 0.92; 95% CI 0.90–0.94). The strength of agreement for all elements was statistically significant (P-value ≤ 0.001). The absence of coded inpatient diagnoses and identified data inaccuracies indicates that existing routine health information systems in public-sector hospitals in the NHI pilot districts are not yet able to sufficiently support reimbursements and resource management. Institutional capacity is needed to undertake diagnostic coding, improve data quality and ensure that a standard discharge summary is completed for every inpatient.

Funder

SAMRC Intramural Research Fund

National Research Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference53 articles.

1. Health information systems: the foundations of public health;AbouZahr;Bull World Health Organ,2005

2. Data quality assessment in healthcare: a 365-day chart review of inpatients’ health records at a Nigerian tertiary hospital;Adeleke;Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,2012

3. Hospital variation in quality of discharge summaries for patients hospitalized with heart failure exacerbation;Al-Damluji;Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes,2015

4. Completeness and concordance of TB and HIV surveillance systems for TB-HIV co-infected patients in South Africa;Auld;The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease,2013

5. Evaluation of electronic discharge summaries: a comparison of documentation in electronic and handwritten discharge summaries;Callen;International Journal of Medical Informatics,2008

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3