Examining multiple funding flows to public healthcare providers in low- and middle-income countries — results from case studies in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Morocco, Nigeria, Tunisia and Vietnam

Author:

Dkhimi Fahdi1ORCID,Honda Ayako2,Hanson Kara3,Mbau Rahab4,Onwujekwe Obinna5ORCID,Phuong Hoang Thi6,Mathauer Inke1,Akhnif El Houcine7ORCID,Jaouadi Imen8,Kiendrébéogo Joël Arthur9,Ezumah Nkoli5,Kabia Evelyn4,Barasa Edwine10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization , 20 Avenue Appia, Geneva 1211, Switzerland

2. Research Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University , 2-1 Naka Kunitachi, Tokyo 186-8601, Japan

3. Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom

4. Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme , PO Box 43640-00100, Nairobi, Kenya

5. Health Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus , Enugu 400001, Nigeria

6. Health Strategy and Policy Institute, Ministry of Health , 196 Alley, Ho Tung Mau, Cau Giay, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam

7. Morocco Country Office, World Health Organization , N3 Avenue Prince Sidi Mohamed, Suissi, Rabat 10000, Morocco

8. École Supérieure de Commerce de Tunis, Université de la Manouba , Tunis, Manouba 2010, Tunisia

9. Health Sciences Training and Research Unit, Department of Public Health, University Joseph Ki-Zerbo , 04 BP 8398, Ouagadougou 04, Burkina Faso

10. Center for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford , Oxford 01540, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Provider payment methods are traditionally examined by appraising the incentive signals inherent in individual payment mechanisms. However, mixed payment arrangements, which result in multiple funding flows from purchasers to providers, could be better understood by applying a systems approach that assesses the combined effects of multiple payment streams on healthcare providers. Guided by the framework developed by Barasa et al. (2021) (Barasa E, Mathauer I, Kabia E et al. 2021. How do healthcare providers respond to multiple funding flows? A conceptual framework and options to align them. Health Policy and Planning  36: 861–8.), this paper synthesizes the findings from six country case studies that examined multiple funding flows and describes the potential effect of multiple payment streams on healthcare provider behaviour in low- and middle-income countries. The qualitative findings from this study reveal the extent of undesirable provider behaviour occurring due to the receipt of multiple funding flows and explain how certain characteristics of funding flows can drive the occurrence of undesirable behaviours. Service and resource shifting occurred in most of the study countries; however, the occurrence of cost shifting was less evident. The perceived adequacy of payment rates was found to be the strongest driver of provider behaviour in the countries examined. The study results indicate that undesirable provider behaviours can have negative impacts on efficiency, equity and quality in healthcare service provision. Further empirical studies are required to add to the evidence on this link. In addition, future research could explore how governance arrangements can be used to coordinate multiple funding flows, mitigate unfavourable consequences and identify issues associated with the implementation of relevant governance measures.

Funder

Department for International Development, UK Government

Universal Health Coverage Partnership

Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference32 articles.

1. Etude sur le système mixte de modalités d’achat et de paiement des services de santé: Cas du Burkina Faso;Appaix,2017

2. How do healthcare providers respond to multiple funding flows? A conceptual framework and options to align them;Barasa;Health Policy and Planning,2021

3. Incentives and provider payment methods;Barnum;International Journal of Health Planning and Management,1995

4. A study on the implementation fidelity of the performance-based financing policy in Burkina Faso after 12 months;Bodson;Archives of Public Health,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3