Equity in public health spending in Ethiopia: a benefit incidence analysis

Author:

Hailu Alemayehu12ORCID,Gebreyes Roman3,Norheim Ole F14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Bergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting, University of Bergen, P.O.Box. 7804, 5020, Bergen, Norway

2. School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, P.O.Box: 9086/1000, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

3. Ethiopian Health Insurance Agency, P.O.Box: 21254/1000, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

4. Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Abstract

Abstract Inequality in access and utilization of health services because of socioeconomic status is unfair, and it should be monitored and corrected with appropriate remedial action. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the distribution of benefits from public spending on health care across socioeconomic groups in Ethiopia using a benefit incidence analysis. We employed health service utilization data from the Living Standard Measurement Survey, recurrent government expenditure data from the Ministry of Finance and health services delivery data from the Ministry of Health’s Health Management Information System. We calculated unit subsidy as the ratio of recurrent government health expenditure on a particular service type to the corresponding number of health services visits. The concentration index (CI) was applied to measure inequality in health care utilization and the distribution of the subsidy across socioeconomic groups. We conducted a disaggregated analysis comparing health delivery levels and service types. Furthermore, we used decomposition analysis to measure the percentage contribution of various factors to the overall inequalities. We found that 61% of recurrent government spending on health goes to health centres (HCs), and 74% was spent on outpatient services. Besides, we found a slightly pro-poor public spending on health, with a CI of −0.039, yet the picture was more nuanced when disaggregated by health delivery levels and service types. The subsidy at the hospital level and for inpatient services benefited the wealthier quintiles most. However, at the HC level and for outpatient services, the subsidies were slightly pro-poor. Therefore, an effort is needed in making inpatient and hospital services more equitable by improving the health service utilization of those in the lower quintiles and those in rural areas. Besides, policymakers in Ethiopia should use this evidence to monitor inequity in government spending on health, thereby improving government resources allocation to target the disadvantaged better.

Funder

International Development Research Centre

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference52 articles.

1. Monitoring hospital performance: the challenge of efficiency in service delivery in Ethiopian hospitals;Accorsi;Quarterly Health Bulletin,2010

2. Examining changes in maternal and child health inequalities in Ethiopia;Ambel;International Journal forEquity in Health,2017

3. Free health care provision and its financial implications in Gondar town, northwest Ethiopia;Ashagrie;The Ethiopian Journal of Health Development,2004

4. Community health extension program of Ethiopia, 2003–2018: successes and challenges toward universal coverage for primary healthcare services;Assefa;Globalization andHealth,2019

5. Paying for and receiving benefits from health services in South Africa: is the health system equitable?;Ataguba;Health Policy and Planning,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3