How does power shape district health management team responsiveness to public feedback in low- and middle-income countries: an interpretive synthesis

Author:

Kagwanja Nancy1ORCID,Molyneux Sassy12,Whyle Eleanor3,Tsofa Benjamin1,Gilson Lucy34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Health Systems Research Ethics Department, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme , Hospital Road, P.O BOX 230-80108, Kilifi, Kenya

2. Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford , Old Road, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK

3. Health Systems and Policy Division, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town , Falmouth Road, Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa

4. Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK

Abstract

Abstract Responsiveness is a core element of World Health Organization’s health system framework, considered important for ensuring inclusive and accountable health systems. System-wide responsiveness requires system-wide action, and district health management teams (DHMTs) play critical governance roles in many health systems. However, there is little evidence on how DHMTs enhance health system responsiveness. We conducted this interpretive literature review to understand how DHMTs receive and respond to public feedback and how power influences these processes. A better understanding of power dynamics could strengthen responsiveness and improve health system performance. Our interpretive synthesis drew on English language articles published between 2000 and 2021. Our search in PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus combined terms related to responsiveness (feedback and accountability) and DHMTs (district health manager) yielding 703 articles. We retained 21 articles after screening. We applied Gaventa’s power cube and Long’s actor interface frameworks to synthesize insights about power. Our analysis identified complex power practices across a range of interfaces involving the public, health system and political actors. Power dynamics were rooted in social and organizational power relationships, personal characteristics (interests, attitudes and previous experiences) and world-views (values and beliefs). DHMTs’ exercise of ‘visible power’ sometimes supported responsiveness; however, they were undermined by the ‘invisible power’ of public sector bureaucracy that shaped generation of responses. Invisible power, manifesting in the subconscious influence of historical marginalization, patriarchal norms and poverty, hindered vulnerable groups from providing feedback. We also identified ‘hidden power’ as influencing what feedback DHMTs received and from whom. Our work highlights the influence of social norms, structures and discrimination on power distribution among actors interacting with, and within, the DHMT. Responsiveness can be strengthened by recognising and building on actors' life-worlds (lived experiences) while paying attention to the broader context in which these life-worlds are embedded.

Funder

Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference72 articles.

1. Designing Iranian model to assess the level of health system responsiveness;Askari;Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal,2016

2. Health system accountability and primary health care delivery in rural Kenya: an analysis of the structures, process and outcomes;Atela,2013

3. Holding health providers in developing countries accountable to consumers: a synthesis of relevant scholarship;Berlan;Health Policy and Planning,2012

4. Scorecards and social accountability for improved maternal and newborn health services: a pilot in the Ashanti and Volta regions of Ghana;Blake;International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics,2016

5. Implementing social accountability for contraceptive services: lessons from Uganda;Boydell;BMC Women’s Health,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3