A systematic review of costing studies for implementing and scaling-up breastfeeding interventions: what do we know and what are the gaps?

Author:

Carroll Grace1ORCID,Safon Cara12,Buccini Gabriela1,Vilar-Compte Mireya3,Teruel Graciela3,Pérez-Escamilla Rafael1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, 135 College St. Suite 200, New Haven, CT 06510, USA

2. Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Talbot Building, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA

3. EQUIDE Research Institute for Equitable Development, Universidad Iberoamericana, Prolongacion Paseo de la Reforma 880, Santa Fe, Zedec Sta Fé, Álvaro Obregón, 01219 Ciudad de México, CDMX, Mexico

Abstract

Abstract Despite the well-established evidence that breastfeeding improves maternal and child health outcomes, global rates of exclusive breastfeeding remain low. Cost estimates can inform stakeholders about the financial resources needed to scale up interventions to ultimately improve breastfeeding outcomes in low-, middle- and high-income countries. To inform the development of comprehensive costing frameworks, this systematic review aimed to (1) identify costing studies for implementing or scaling-up breastfeeding interventions, (2) assess the quality of identified costing studies and (3) examine the availability of cost data to identify gaps that need to be addressed through future research. Peer-reviewed and grey literature were systematically searched using a combination of index terms and relevant text words related to cost and the following breastfeeding interventions: breastfeeding counselling, maternity leave, the World Health Organization International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes, the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, media promotion, workplace support and pro-breastfeeding social policies. Data were extracted after having established inter-rater reliability among the first two authors. The quality of studies was assessed using an eight-item checklist for key costing study attributes. Forty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, with the majority including costs for breastfeeding counselling and paid maternity leave. Most cost analyses included key costing study attributes; however, major weaknesses among the studies were the lack of clarity on costing perspectives and not accounting for the uncertainty of reported cost estimates. Costing methodologies varied substantially, standardized costing frameworks are needed for reliably estimating the costs of implementing and scaling-up breastfeeding interventions at local-, national- or global-levels.

Funder

Family Larsson-Rosenquist Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference84 articles.

1. Economic evaluation of prolonging the postnatal period [Evaluacion economica de la prolongacion del postnatal];Aedo;Revista Chilena de Pediatria,2007

2. Baby-Friendly hospital practices and birth costs;Allen;Birth,2013

3. Pilot testing of the Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly toolbox in Ghana;Aryeetey;International Breastfeeding Journal,2018

4. Breastfeeding and the U.S. economy;Bartick;Breastfeeding Medicine,2011

5. The burden of suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: a pediatric cost analysis;Bartick;Pediatrics,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3