Policy space and pro-health equity national policymaking: a case study of Myanmar during political transition (2006–16)

Author:

Campbell Fiona1,Sein Than Tun2,Htoo Thant Sin3,Khine Wai Yee Krystal4,Howard Natasha15ORCID,Balabanova Dina1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom

2. Department of Medical Research, Formerly Ministry of Health, No. 5 Ziwaka Road, Yangon 11191, Myanmar

3. Ministry of Health and Sports, Minister’s Office, No. 249 Theinbyu Road, Mingalar Taung Nyunt Township, Yangon, Myanmar

4. Formerly 3MDG Fund , No. 12 O Pyi Thu Street, Yangon, Myanmar

5. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System , 12 Science Drive 2, Singapore 117549, Singapore

Abstract

AbstractHealth equity is central to achieving sustainable development goals and COVID-19 has emphasized its importance. Ensuring health equity is prominent in policy discussions and decision-making is a critical challenge in all countries. Understanding the policy space for actors to promote health equity in the policy process may help to strengthen prioritization of equity in policy and programme discussions and decisions. Authors developed a conceptual framework for policy space based on a narrative literature review. This comprised five key elements and their associated factors, i.e. context, policy circumstances, policy characteristics, actor engagement and policy spaces. Authors then applied it in Myanmar during a period of political transition, using a qualitative case study design. Findings showed that political transition provided an important ‘policy window’ to develop more equitable health policy in Myanmar. Changing policy circumstances offered opportunities for advancing pro-equity policy. However, lack of visibility of health equity and long-standing inequalities were important challenges to policy space. Within a changing context, actors at individual and organizational levels used a range of policy spaces to advance pro-equity health policy. Learning from using the framework in Myanmar was incorporated into a revised framework. Application of this revised framework could provide valuable insights into the opportunities to promote a pro-health equity approach across policy and programme discussions and decision-making for actors trying to promote equity in other transition and non-transition contexts.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference51 articles.

1. Good health at low cost 25 years on: lessons for the future of health systems strengthening;Balabanova;The Lancet,2013

2. Promoting health equity in conflict-affected fragile states;Bornemisza;Social Science & Medicine,2010

3. Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement;Braveman;Annual Review of Public Health,2006

4. Social conditions, health equity and human rights;Braveman;Health and Human Rights,2010

5. Defining health equity. Theory and methods;Braveman;Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3