Rethinking collaboration: developing a learning platform to address under-five mortality in Mpumalanga province, South Africa

Author:

D’Ambruoso Lucia123,van der Merwe Maria1,Wariri Oghenebrume14ORCID,Byass Peter123,Goosen Gerhard5,Kahn Kathleen236,Masinga Sparara5,Mokoena Victoria5,Spies Barry5,Tollman Stephen236,Witter Sophie7ORCID,Twine Rhian3

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Global Development and Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

2. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå Centre for Global Health Research, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

3. MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

4. Medical Research Council (MRC) Unit, The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK

5. Mpumalanga Department of Health, Nelspruit, South Africa

6. INDEPTH Network, Accra, Ghana

7. Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

Abstract Following 50 years of apartheid, South Africa introduced visionary health policy committing to the right to health as part of a primary health care (PHC) approach. Implementation is seriously challenged, however, in an often-dysfunctional health system with scarce resources and a complex burden of avoidable mortality persists. Our aim was to develop a process generating evidence of practical relevance on implementation processes among people excluded from access to health systems. Informed by health policy and systems research, we developed a collaborative learning platform in which we worked as co-researchers with health authorities in a rural province. This article reports on the process and insights brought by health systems stakeholders. Evidence gaps on under-five mortality were identified with a provincial Directorate after which we collected quantitative and qualitative data. We applied verbal autopsy to quantify levels, causes and circumstances of deaths and participatory action research to gain community perspectives on the problem and priorities for action. We then re-convened health systems stakeholders to analyse and interpret these data through which several systems issues were identified as contributory to under-five deaths: staff availability and performance; service organization and infrastructure; multiple parallel initiatives; and capacity to address social determinants. Recommendations were developed ranging from immediate low- and no-cost re-organization of services to those where responses from higher levels of the system or outside were required. The process was viewed as acceptable and relevant for an overburdened system operating ‘in the dark’ in the absence of local data. Institutional infrastructure for evidence-based decision-making does not exist in many health systems. We developed a process connecting research evidence on rural health priorities with the means for action and enabled new partnerships between communities, authorities and researchers. Further development is planned to understand potential in deliberative processes for rural PHC.

Funder

Health Systems Research Initiative

Department for International Development

DFID

Medical Research Council

MRC

Wellcome Trust

Economic and Social Research Council

ESRC

Umeå Centre for Global Health Research

FORTE: Swedish Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare

The School of Public Health

University of the Witwatersrand

South African Medical Research Council

Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit and Agincourt HDSS

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

FCO

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference91 articles.

1. Are our “UHC systems” learning systems? Piloting an assessment tool and process in six African countries;Akhnif;Health Research Policy and Systems,2018

2. Creating space for quality improvement;Allwood;BMJ (Clinical Research ed.),2018

3. Defining and improving the role of emergency medical services in Cape Town, South Africa;Anest;Emergency Medicine Journal,2016

4. South Africa rolls out pilot health insurance scheme;Baleta;Lancet,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3