Divergences between mainstream and social media discourses after COP26, and why they matter

Author:

Sanford Mary123ORCID,Painter James45

Affiliation:

1. CMCC Foundation—Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change , Lecce, 73100, Italy

2. RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment , Milan, 20144, Italy

3. Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University , Oxford, OX13JS, United Kingdom

4. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Oxford University, Oxford University , Oxford, OX26PS, United Kingdom

5. School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University , Oxford, OX13QY, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract UN climate conferences (COPs) have become powerful opportunities for driving public attention to climate issues and raising awareness via mainstream and social media coverage. While there is an abundance of studies examining various elements of the media arenas separately, there are currently no comparative analyses of how mainstream media outlets and social media opinion leaders react to and thereby shape discourses around COPs. Using Bourdieu’s field theory to conceptualize agents in the two arenas as ‘adversaries’, we use manual content analysis to compare reactions to the 2021 Glasgow climate conference (COP26) across the five top English-language online newspapers in Australia, India, the UK and the USA with those of prominent users and organizations on Facebook and Instagram. We find entirely different appraisals of the conference between the two arenas: Where the mainstream media outlets highlighted the progress of the summit, social media leaders were eager to criticize its failures and those of world leaders to take sufficient action. We discuss the implications of this divergence, specifically (i) the extent to which it hinders the cultivation of cohesive narratives about critical climate issues, and (ii) how the failure frame advocated by social media opinion leaders may de-legitimize international policy initiatives and undercut public support for and engagement with these efforts.

Funder

UKRI ESRC

Children's Investment Fund Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference78 articles.

1. World newspaper coverage of climate change or global warming, 2004-2024;Boykoff;Media and Climate Change Observatory Data Sets,2024

2. Moment of hope, mode of realism: on the dynamics of a transnational journalistic field during UN climate change summits;Kunelius;Int J Commun,2012

3. Conference of the parties meetings as regularly scheduled critical events for global climate governance: reflecting on COP 26 and the Glasgow Climate Pact;Stoddart;Soc Nat Res,2023

4. Media coverage of international climate summits and negotiations;Wolling;Oxf Res Encycl Climate Sci,2017

5. The event-centered nature of global public spheres: the UN climate change conferences, fridays for future, and the (limited) transnationalization of media debates;Wozniak;Int J Commun,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3