Affiliation:
1. Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University , Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
2. Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton , Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
Abstract
Abstract
To avoid global warming in excess of 1.5°C under the current sluggish adoption of drastic reductions in global greenhouse gas emissions, application of methods to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere will become essential in the near future; yet, development of these methods is in its infancy. Land-based methods are further developed than marine methods, but it is likely that similar-scaled application will be necessary in both realms. There are many misconceptions in discussion groups and fora about the ‘simplicity’ or ‘ease’ of proposed marine applications, partly because the complex marine carbon cycle is insufficiently understood by the proponents, having been discussed in largely inaccessible, technical texts only. This review outlines the basic operation of the marine carbon cycle in straightforward terms, with some simplifications, to help advance the debate among the wider community. Break-out boxes provide additional detail where desired, and references (and the sources cited therein) provide avenues for further study. The review then discusses two potential marine methods for atmospheric carbon removal that are thought to offer the greatest potential in terms of carbon removal mass: ocean iron fertilization and ocean alkalinity enhancement. Finally, six statements/arguments that seem to regularly crop up in carbon removal discussion groups are evaluated within the perspective of the compiled and reviewed information.
Funder
Climate Recovery Institute
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference134 articles.
1. Realization of Paris Agreement pledges may limit warming just below 2°C;Meinshausen;Nature,2022
2. High level review of a wide range of proposed marine geoengineering techniques;GESAMP;GESAMP Rep Stud,2019