Author:
Holtmann Anne Christine,Ehlert Martin,Menze Laura,Solga Heike
Abstract
Abstract:
Many countries have implemented youth (un)employment programmes for low-achieving young people to improve their employment prospects. In Germany, these youths are often channelled into prevocational programmes to prevent them from long-term ‘scars’ by providing a ‘second chance’ to enter apprenticeships (serving as entry into the labour market in Germany). However, the usefulness of these programmes is contested. It remains unclear whether it is (more) useful for young people to invest in education and improve formal qualifications (to send a positive ‘signal’) or to spend more time in firms (e.g. to counteract possible discrimination processes or to generate new network ties). It is also unclear who benefits most depending on previous school-leaving certificates. We address these questions by using rich data from the German National Educational Panel Study and apply entropy balancing as a matching approach to control for selection. We find that both attaining a higher school certificate and spending time in firms improve low-achieving youth’s chances to enter apprenticeships. However, only those who attained a higher-level school certificate are able to enter higher-status training occupations afterwards. Moreover, prevocational programmes are most beneficial for the most disadvantaged.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference75 articles.
1. Vocational training for disadvantaged youth in Colombia;Attanasio;American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,2017
2. “Kleben Bleiben?” Der Übergang von Hauptschüler/innen in eine berufliche Ausbildung;Baas;Sozialer Fortschritt,2012
3. Entwicklung der Basiskompetenzen im Übergangssystem;Behrendt;Unterrichtswissenschaft,2017
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献