Examining what factors affect inter-agency working in missing children investigations

Author:

Waring Sara1,Monaghan Paige1ORCID,Yates Amy1,Girgiel Nikola1,Giles Susan1,O’Brien Freya2

Affiliation:

1. University of Liverpool, Department of Psychological Sciences, Eleanor Rathbone Building , Bedford Street South, Liverpool, L69 7ZA , UK

2. Liverpool John Moores University, School of Justice Studies, John Foster Building , 80-98 Mount Pleasant, Liverpool L3 5UZ , UK

Abstract

Abstract Despite responsibility for missing children belonging to multiple agencies, police perceive this to be falling heavily on their shoulders, placing substantial demand on finite resources. Drawing on thematic analysis of 24 interviews conducted with police, local authority, social service, and care home staff from across three UK boroughs, the following study seeks to identify what factors facilitate and hinder inter-agency working in the prevention and response to missing children and why. Findings highlight that inter-agency working is facilitated by having ‘direct points of contact’ across agencies to facilitate information sharing. Inter-agency working is hindered by ‘inconsistent definitions of missing’, limited ‘understanding of roles and responsibilities’, ‘service demand’, ‘technological issues’, ‘fear’, and ‘discrepancies in responses to missing’. Evidence suggests that partnership working would be facilitated by improving shared understanding of missing, roles and responsibilities, and having direct points of contact across agencies.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law

Reference63 articles.

1. ‘Multi-agency Working.’;Atkinson;Journal of Early Childhood Research,2005

2. Atkinson, M., Jones, M., and Lamont, E. (2007). Multiagency working and its implications for practice: a review of the literature. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/nfer/publications/mad01/mad01.pdf (accessed 25 June 2022).

3. ‘Missing Children: On the Extent, Patterns, and Correlates of Repeat Disappearances by Young People.’;Babuta;Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice,,2018

4. ‘Repeat Missing Child Reports: Prevalence, Timing, and Risk Factors.’;Bezeczky;Children and Youth Services Review,2022

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3