Re-defining evidence-based policing

Author:

Klose Stephan1

Affiliation:

1. Brussels School of Governance, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) , Belgium

Abstract

Abstract This article re-defines evidence-based policing as ‘a decision-making process which integrates the best available evidence, professional judgement and community values, preferences and circumstances’. The article argues that this definition serves to position evidence-based policing more clearly as a research-informed, practitioner-centred, and community-oriented approach to policing practice. It moreover advances links between evidence-based policing and related concepts—such as evidence-based medicine—which, in turn, promises to address misunderstandings in (and streamline) debates about evidence-based practice across disciplinary lines. The article provides an in-depth discussion of each key element of its proposed three-pronged definition—best available evidence, professional judgement, and community values, preferences, and circumstances—through a review of ongoing discussions about evidence-based policing in the field of criminology and evolving discussions (and conceptualizations) of evidence-based practice across other disciplines. Finally, the article outlines how its proposed definition—and its three integral elements—can guide the future development of an evidence-based policing agenda.

Funder

European Union’s Horizon

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference50 articles.

1. ‘Taking an Evidence-Based Approach to Evidence-Based Policing Research.’;Boulton;Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice,2021

2. ‘Ending the ‘Dialogue of the Deaf’: Evidence and Policing Policies and Practices. An Australian Case Study.’;Bradley,2013

3. ‘Evidence-Based Policing: Competing or Complementary Models?.’;Brown,2019

4. ‘Extending the Remit of Evidence-Based Policing.’;Brown;International Journal of Police Science & Management,2018

5. ‘Introduction: Evidence-Based Practice and Policing: Background and Context.’;Bullock,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evidence-Based Social Sciences and Practices: A Scoping Review;Journal of Language and Education;2024-06-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3