Κey Role of Early Source Control in Candidemic Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock

Author:

Papadimitriou-Olivgeris Matthaios12ORCID,Battistolo Julien1,Poissy Julien13,Coste Alix4,Bochud Pierre-Yves1,Calandra Thierry1,Senn Laurence12,Lamoth Frédéric14

Affiliation:

1. Infectious Diseases Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne , Lausanne , Switzerland

2. Service of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne , Lausanne , Switzerland

3. Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Pôle de réanimation, University of Lille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille , Lille , France

4. Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne , Lausanne , Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite advances in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, candidemia remains associated with high mortality rates. This study aimed at identifying predictors of mortality among patients with candidemia, with a focus on early interventions that can improve prognosis. Methods This was a single-center retrospective study including all adult patients with at least 1 positive blood culture for Candida species from 2014 to 2021. Results A total of 222 episodes of candidemia were included. Most candidemias were of unknown origin (36%) or vascular catheter related (29%). Septic shock developed in 29% episodes. Overall, 14-day mortality rate was 23%. In univariate analyses, septic shock was associated with higher 14-day mortality, whereas catheter-related candidemia and early (<72 hours) interventions, such as appropriate antifungal therapy, source control, and infectious diseases consultation, were associated with improved survival. In a Cox multivariate regression model, septic shock (odds ratio [OR], 3.62 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.05–6.38]) was associated with higher mortality. While the impact of early antifungal therapy did not reach statistical significance, early (<72 hours) infectious diseases consultation (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, .23–.91]) and early source control (OR, 0.15 [95% CI, .08–.31]) were associated with better survival. Subanalyses showed that the benefits of early source control, specifically catheter removal, were significant among patients with sepsis or septic shock, but not among those without sepsis. These associations remained significant after exclusion of patients who died prematurely or were in palliative care. Conclusions Early source control, in particular catheter removal, was a key determinant of outcome among candidemic patients with sepsis or septic shock.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3