147. Antibiotic Prescribing: Shorter is Also Better in the Emergency Department

Author:

Vuong Lisa1,Faison Darius2,Thomson Julie1,Kenney Rachel1,Davis Susan L3,Davis Susan L3

Affiliation:

1. Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI

2. Henry Ford Wyandotte, Wyandotte, MI

3. Wayne State University, Detroit, MI

Abstract

Abstract Background Published information suggests room for improvement in antibiotics prescribed on discharge from the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study was to evaluate antibiotic prescribing in the ED for uncomplicated infections of the lower respiratory tract (LRTI), urinary tract (UTI), and skin and skin structure (SSTI). Methods IRB-approved retrospective cross-sectional study of patients discharged from the ED from January to June 2019 at 6 locations. Inclusion: ≥ 18 years old and uncomplicated LRTI, UTI, or SSTI. Exclusion: hospital admission. Appropriate prescribing was defined having all three of the following correct per local and national guidelines: antibiotic selection, dose, and duration. Correct duration: 5 days for LRTI and SSTI; 3 days for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), 5 days for nitrofurantoin (NFT), and 7 days for beta-lactams for UTIs. Endpoints within 7 days: antibiotic escalation, readmission to ED or hospital, any outpatient contact, and report of adverse drug event (ADE). Endpoints within 90 days: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Descriptive and bivariable statistics were performed. Results Inappropriate prescribing: 77% (304) vs. appropriate 23% (89). Infection type: 47.8% SSTI, 30% UTI, and 22.1% LRTI. SSTI was associated with the greatest proportion of inappropriate prescribing at 89.4% (Figure 1). Comparisons for inappropriate vs. appropriate groups: 15.8% vs. 22.5% for beta-lactam allergy and 23.4% vs. 19.1% for cultures drawn in ED. Most common antibiotics for inappropriate vs. appropriate: first generation cephalosporin at 70.1% vs. 7.3% (p< 0.05), TMP-SMX at 14.3% vs. 12.2% (p=0.75), and NFT at 7.8% vs. 65.9% (p< 0.05). Prescriptions considered inappropriate were primarily driven by excess duration (Figure 2). Endpoints for inappropriate vs. appropriate groups: antibiotic escalation at 6.6% (2.8% were due to cultures drawn in the ED) vs. 1.1% (p=0.06), readmission at 8.6% vs. 9.0% (p=0.9), any outpatient contact at 18.4% vs. 19.1% (p=0.89), and report of ADE at 1.3% vs. 1.1%. No CDI in either group. Figure 1. Appropriateness of Discharge Prescriptions by Infection Type, N = 393 Figure 2. Subset Analysis: Reasons for Inappropriate Prescribing, n = 304 Conclusion The main reason for inappropriate prescribing in the ED was excess duration of therapy, making this an area of opportunity for future antibiotic stewardship improvement. Disclosures Rachel Kenney, PharmD, Medtronic, Inc. (Other Financial or Material Support, spouse is an employee and shareholder) Susan L. Davis, PharmD, Nothing to disclose

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3