Ethical considerations regarding penis transplantation surgery in transgender men—an empirical ethics study

Author:

de Haseth Kristin B1234,Gehrels Anne M1256,Widdershoven Guy456,Bouman Mark-Bram1234,van de Grift Tim C1234

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic , Gender, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, , Amsterdam , The Netherlands

2. Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc , Gender, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, , Amsterdam , The Netherlands

3. Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc , Amsterdam , The Netherlands

4. Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc , Amsterdam , The Netherlands

5. Department of Ethics , Law and Humanities, , Amsterdam , The Netherlands

6. Amsterdam UMC, VU University , Law and Humanities, , Amsterdam , The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Background The ongoing quest to surgically create the (nearly) ideal neophallus in transgender men has led to the continuous development of transgender medicine and the proposed introduction of penis transplantation. However, both technical and ethical issues arise when developing this treatment. Aim We sought to extract ethical considerations among different stakeholder groups regarding penile transplantation surgery in transgender men and to define preliminary clinical recommendations. Methods Three semistructured focus groups, consisting of different stakeholders, were organized to participate in discussions of ethical considerations retrieved from the ethics literature of transplantation and transgender medicine. Analysis of the results was performed according to empirical ethics. Outcomes Study outcomes were the identification of qualitative themes describing ethical considerations pertaining to penile transplantation in transgender men. Results Nineteen people participated in this qualitative study. The main domains that emerged included arguments in favor of and arguments against penile transplantation. Although the participants expressed positive attitudes toward developing this care, with acknowledgement of the current limitations stakeholders of all groups were reluctant to endorse the introduction of penile transplantation for transgender men at this point. Clinical Implications Under the present circumstances, all groups expressed both a wide variety of ethical considerations as well as a tendency to prefer developing alternative treatment options or improving the results of currently available treatments in relation to penile transplantation for transgender men. Strengths and Limitations This study was the first (empirical) study to focus on this topic and included a diversity of stakeholder perspectives. Limitations included the hypothetical nature of the discussion as well as the clinical setting in which the topic has been studied. Conclusion Introducing penile transplantation for transgender men, under the current circumstances, comes with a wide range of ethical considerations, which deal with personal identity, autonomy, medical risks, risk for transgender support and donor willingness, and issues regarding equality. Despite the present hesitancy to use penile transplantation, should the technical side of this treatment option develop, further research in the ethical field of penile transplantation for transgender men is recommended.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Urology,Dermatology,Reproductive Medicine,Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3