Modified MR scoring system for assessment of sonographically indeterminate ovarian and adnexal masses in the absence of dynamic contrast-enhanced

Author:

Moradi Behnaz1,Rahmani Maryam1,Aghasi Maryam2,Yarandi Fariba3,Malek Mahrooz1,Hosseini Ashrafsadat1,Ghafouri Kimia4,Hasan Zadeh Tabatabaei Mahgol Sadat4,Shirali Elham3,Riahi Samani Payam1,Firouznia Sina5

Affiliation:

1. Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, 1419733141, Iran

2. Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Science , Tehran, 141973141, Iran

3. Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Women Yas Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Science , Tehran, Iran

4. Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, 1419733141, Iran

5. Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University , Prague, 116 36, Czech Republic

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI is not available in all imaging centres to investigate adnexal masses. We proposed modified magnetic resonance (MR) scoring system based on an assessment of the enhancement of the solid tissue on early phase postcontrast series and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map and investigated the validity of this protocols in the current study. Materials and Methods In this cross-sectional retrospective study, pelvic MRI of a total of 245 patients with 340 adnexal masses were studied based on the proposed modified scoring system and ADNEX MR scoring system. Results Modified scoring system with the sensitivity of 87.3% and specificity of 94.6% has an accuracy of 92.1%. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ADNEX MR scoring system is 96.6%, 91%, and 92.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the modified scoring system and ADNEX MR scoring system is 0.909 (with 0.870-0.938 95% confidence interval [CI]) and 0.938 (with 0.907-0.961 95% CI), respectively. Pairwise comparison of these area under the curves showed no significant difference (P = .053). Conclusions Modified scoring system is less sensitive than the ADNEX MR scoring system and more specific but the accuracy is not significantly different. Advances in knowledge According to our study, MR scoring system based on subjective assessment of the enhancement of the solid tissue on early phase postcontrast series and DWI with ADC map could be applicable in imaging centres that DCE is not available.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3