Abstract
Abstract
In a recent decision, the British Columbia Supreme Court held that a trust created to assist people who had been terminated improperly from their employment was not established for a valid charitable purpose because (a) it was an inefficient method of relieving poverty and (b) may not have assisted a sufficiently large segment of society. Joel Nitikman outlines the facts and reasoning of the Court and suggests that its reasons may not have been altogether correct.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)