Effect of bone and analytical method on assessment of bone mineralization in response to dietary phosphorus, phytase, and vitamin D in finishing pigs

Author:

Williams Hadley R1,Tokach Mike D1,Woodworth Jason C1ORCID,Goodband Robert D1,DeRouchey Joel M1,Bergstrom Jon R2,Hastad Chad W3,Post Zach B3,Rahe Michael C4,Siepker Christopher L4,Sitthicharoenchai Panchan4,Ensley Steve M5,Radke Scott L4,Gebhardt Jordan T6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University , Manhattan, KS 66506-0201 , USA

2. DSM Nutritional Products , Parsippany, NJ 07054 , USA

3. New Fashion Pork , Jackson, MN 56143, USA

4. Department of Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University , Ames, IA 50011 , USA

5. Department of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University , Manhattan, KS 66506-0201 , USA

6. Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University , Manhattan, KS 66506-0201 , USA

Abstract

Abstract A total of 882 pigs (PIC TR4 × [Fast LW × PIC L02]; initially 33.2 ± 0.31 kg) were used in a 112-d study to evaluate the effects of different bones and analytical methods on the assessment of bone mineralization response to changes in dietary P, phytase, and vitamin D in growing pigs. Pens of pigs (20 pigs per pen) were randomized to one of five dietary treatments with nine pens per treatment. Dietary treatments were designed to create differences in bone mineralization and included: 1) P at 80% of NRC (2012) standardized total tract digestible (STTD) P requirement, 2) NRC STTD P with no phytase, 3) NRC STTD P with phytase providing an assumed release of 0.14% STTD P from 2,000 FYT/kg, 4) high STTD P (128% of the NRC P) using monocalcium phosphate and phytase, and 5) diet 4 with additional vitamin D3 from 25(OH)D3. On day 112, one pig per pen was euthanized for bone, blood, and urine analysis. Additionally, 11 pigs identified as having poor body condition which indicated a history of low feed intake (unhealthy) were sampled. There were no differences between treatments for final body weight, average daily gain, average daily feed intake, gain to feed, or bone ash measurements (treatment × bone interaction) regardless of bone ash method. The response to treatment for bone density and bone mineral content was dependent upon the bone sampled (density interaction, P = 0.053; mineral interaction, P = 0.078). For 10th rib bone density, pigs fed high levels of P had increased (P < 0.05) bone density compared with pigs fed NRC levels with phytase, with pigs fed deficient P, NRC levels of P with no phytase, and high STTD P with extra 25(OH)D3 intermediate, with no differences for metacarpals, fibulas, or 2nd ribs. Pigs fed extra vitamin D from 25(OH)D3 had increased (P < 0.05) 10th rib bone mineral content compared with pigs fed deficient P and NRC levels of P with phytase, with pigs fed industry P and vitamin D, and NRC P with monocalcium intermediate. Healthy pigs had greater (P < 0.05) serum Ca, P, vitamin D concentrations, and defatted bone ash than those unhealthy, with no difference between the two health statuses for non-defatted bone ash. In summary, differences between bone ash procedures were more apparent than differences between diets. Differences in bone density and mineral content in response to dietary P and vitamin D were most apparent with 10th ribs.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference20 articles.

1. Survey of serum vitamin D status across stages of swine production and evaluation of supplemental bulk vitamin D premixes used in swine diets;Arnold;J. Swine Health Prod,2015

2. Effects of a novel corn-expressed E. coli phytase digestibility of calcium and phosphorous, growth performance, and bone ash in young growing pigs;Blavi;J. Anim. Sci,2019

3. Calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D, and vitamin K in swine nutrition;Crenshaw,2001

4. Femurs are more accurate than fibulas as predictors of whole body bone mineral content in growing pigs;Crenshaw;J. Anim. Sci,2009

5. Bone composition in cattle, pigs, sheep, and poultry;Field;J. Anim. Sci,1974

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3