Matching methods for truncation by death problems

Author:

Zehavi Tamir1,Nevo DanielORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv 69978 , Israel

Abstract

Abstract Even in a carefully designed randomised trial, outcomes for some study participants can be missing, or more precisely, ill defined, because participants had died prior to outcome collection. This problem, known as truncation by death, means that the treated and untreated are no longer balanced with respect to covariates determining survival. Therefore, researchers often utilise principal stratification and focus on the Survivor Average Causal Effect (SACE). We present matching-based methods for SACE identification and estimation. We provide identification results motivating the use of matching and discuss practical issues, including the choice of distance measures, matching with replacement, and post-matching estimators. Because the assumptions needed for SACE identification can be too strong, we also present sensitivity analysis techniques and illustrate their use in real data analysis.

Funder

Israel Science Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Statistics and Probability

Reference37 articles.

1. Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects;Abadie;Econometrica,2006

2. On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators;Abadie;Econometrica,2008

3. Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects;Abadie;Journal of Business & Economic Statistics,2011

4. Robust post-matching inference;Abadie;Journal of the American Statistical Association,2022

5. Estimation and sensitivity analysis of the survivor average causal effect under the monotonicity assumption;Chiba;Journal of Biometrics and Biostatistics,2012

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3