Clinical, contextual and hospital-level factors associated with escalation and de-escalation of empiric Gram-negative antibiotics among US inpatients

Author:

Baghdadi Jonathan D1ORCID,Goodman Katherine E1ORCID,Magder Laurence S1,Heil Emily L2,Claeys Kimberly2,Bork Jacqueline3,Harris Anthony D1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD , USA

2. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy , Baltimore, MD , USA

3. Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Empiric Gram-negative antibiotics are frequently changed in response to new information. To inform antibiotic stewardship, we sought to identify predictors of antibiotic changes using information knowable before microbiological test results. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study. Survival-time models were used to evaluate clinical factors associated with antibiotic escalation and de-escalation (defined as an increase or decrease, respectively, in the spectrum or number of Gram-negative antibiotics within 5 days of initiation). Spectrum was categorized as narrow, broad, extended or protected. Tjur’s D statistic was used to estimate the discriminatory power of groups of variables. Results In 2019, 2 751 969 patients received empiric Gram-negative antibiotics at 920 study hospitals. Antibiotic escalation occurred in 6.5%, and 49.2% underwent de-escalation; 8.8% were changed to an equivalent regimen. Escalation was more likely when empiric antibiotics were narrow-spectrum (HR 19.0 relative to protected; 95% CI: 17.9–20.1), broad-spectrum (HR 10.3; 95% CI: 9.78–10.9) or extended-spectrum (HR 3.49; 95% CI: 3.30–3.69). Patients with sepsis present on admission (HR 1.94; 95% CI: 1.91–1.96) and urinary tract infection present on admission (HR 1.36; 95% CI: 1.35–1.38) were more likely to undergo antibiotic escalation than patients without these syndromes. De-escalation was more likely with combination therapy (HR 2.62 per additional agent; 95% CI: 2.61–2.63) or narrow-spectrum empiric antibiotics (HR 1.67 relative to protected; 95% CI: 1.65–1.69). Choice of empiric regimen accounted for 51% and 74% of the explained variation in antibiotic escalation and de-escalation, respectively. Conclusions Empiric Gram-negative antibiotics are frequently de-escalated early in hospitalization, whereas escalation is infrequent. Changes are primarily driven by choice of empiric therapy and presence of infectious syndromes.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Microbiology (medical),Infectious Diseases,Immunology and Allergy,Microbiology,Immunology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3