Evaluating patient attitudes to increased patient engagement with antimicrobial stewardship: a quantitative survey

Author:

Hughes Gerry12ORCID,O’Toole Eilis3,Talento Alida Fe45ORCID,O’Leary Aisling67,Bergin Colm12

Affiliation:

1. Dept. of Genitourinary Medicine and Infectious Diseases, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

2. School of Medicine, University of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

3. Wellcome Health Research Board Clinical Research Facility, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

4. Dept. of Clinical Microbiology, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Louth, Ireland

5. Dept. of Clinical Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

6. National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

7. School of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland

Abstract

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) describes interventions designed to optimize antimicrobial therapy, minimize adverse treatment consequences and reduce the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Previous research has investigated the patient’s role in healthcare infection prevention but the patient’s role in AMS has not been extensively explored. Objectives To investigate the willingness of hospital inpatients to question staff about prudent antimicrobial use in an Irish hospital and evaluate the impact of patient and public involvement in research (PPI) on this study. Methods A survey was co-designed with the hospital Patient Representative Group (PRG) to evaluate patient willingness to engage with prudent antimicrobial treatment. A random sample of 200 inpatients was selected to self-complete the survey using pen and paper. PRG members provided feedback on their involvement. Results Of the 200 inpatients randomly selected to participate, 120 did not fulfil the inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 80, 67 participated (response 84%). Median respondent age was 58 years, 30% were employed and 30% had a third-level education degree. Over 90% had not heard of AMS while just over 50% had not heard of AMR. Patients preferred asking factual questions rather than challenging ones but did not have a preference in asking questions of doctors compared with nurses. Older patients were less likely to ask questions. PRG members reported an overall positive experience as research collaborators. Conclusions Future patient-centred AMS interventions should empower patients to ask about antimicrobial treatment, in particular the older patient cohort. PPI is a valuable component of patient-centred research.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference40 articles.

1. Understanding the mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance;Holmes;Lancet,2016

2. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients;Davey;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017

3. Antimicrobial stewardship: we know it works; time to make sure it is in place everywhere;Plachouras;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017

4. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship;Dellit;Clin Infect Dis,2007

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3