Antimicrobial guidelines in clinical practice: incorporating the ethical perspective

Author:

Lambregts Merel1ORCID,Rump Babette2ORCID,Ropers Fabienne3,Sijbom Martijn4ORCID,Petrignani Mariska5,Visser Leo1,de Vries Martine6,de Boer Mark1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands

2. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Infectious Diseases Control (RIVM-LCI), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

3. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

4. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands

5. Department of Infectious Diseases, Haaglanden Municipal Health Service, Westeinde 128, 2512HE Den Haag, The Netherlands

6. Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Ethics and Law, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Guidelines on antimicrobial therapy are subject to periodic revision to anticipate changes in the epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance and new scientific knowledge. Changing a policy to a broader spectrum has important consequences on both the individual patient level (e.g. effectiveness, toxicity) and population level (e.g. emerging resistance, costs). By combining both clinical data evaluation and an ethical analysis, we aim to propose a comprehensive framework to guide antibiotic policy dilemmas. Methods A preliminary framework for decision-making on antimicrobial policy was constructed based on existing literature and panel discussions. Antibiotic policy themes were translated into specific elements that were fitted into this framework. The adapted framework was evaluated in two moral deliberation groups. The moral deliberation sessions were analysed using ATLAS.ti statistical software to categorize arguments and evaluate completeness of the final framework. Results The final framework outlines the process of data evaluation, ethical deliberation and decision-making. The first phase is a factual data exploration. In the second phase, perspectives are weighed and the policy of moral preference is formulated. Judgments are made on three levels: the individual patient, the patient population and society. In the final phase, feasibility, implementation and re-evaluation are addressed. Conclusions The proposed framework facilitates decision-making on antibiotic policy by structuring existing data, identifying knowledge gaps, explicating ethical considerations and balancing interests of the individual and current and future generations.

Funder

Dutch Ministry of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3