Online calls for protest and offline mobilization in autocracies: evidence from the 2017 Dey Protests in Iran

Author:

Kadivar Mohammad Ali1,Ketchley Neil2,Sotoudeh-Sherbaf Abolfazl3,Barrie Christopher4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, Boston College ,  McGuinn Hall 426, Boston , USA

2. Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford , Manor Road Building, Manor Rd, Oxford OX1 3UQ , UK

3. Health, Law, Policy and Management, Boston University ,  715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118 , USA

4. Department of Sociology, University of Edinburgh ,  15a George Square Edinburgh EH8 9LD , UK

Abstract

Abstract A body of research suggests that social media has afforded new opportunities for orchestrating mobilization in autocracies. However, the mechanisms linking online coordination with offline mobilization are rarely demonstrated. We address this lacuna by exploring the impact of Farsi-language social media posts that called for protest on precise days and locations in Iran during the 2017 ‘Dey Protests’. To conduct our analysis, we match a dataset of posts with an original protest event catalogue. Our results show that if a district was the subject of a protest call, it was much more likely to witness higher levels of mobilization on the target date. This relationship was especially pronounced for calls that received more online engagement. The findings suggest that the digital commons can play a role akin to an analogue protest flyer: social media posts can inform broad audiences of the where and when of upcoming mobilization.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference87 articles.

1. 300 More people have been released from recent protest related detentions. Tehran’s prosecutor: most of the detainees were between 18 and 35 years old and from lower social classes. So far, 440 people have been released in Tehran;Aftabnews,2018

2. The demands of the people in the issue of dealing with high prices are right, no doubt, but the problems, life and livelihood should not be used as a tool for the victory of the enemy/1500 tomans gasoline is not attractive to the demands of the people;Alef,2017

3. “Networked” revolutions? ICTs and protest mobilization in non-democratic regimes;Anderson;Political Research Quarterly,2021

4. The dynamics of protest diffusion: movement organizations, social networks, and news media in the 1960 sit-ins;Andrews;American Sociological Review,2006

5. Combining natural language processing and network analysis to examine how advocacy organizations stimulate conversation on social media;Bail;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2016

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3