Assessment of causal effects of visceral adipose tissue on risk of cancers: a Mendelian randomization study

Author:

Lu Yao123,Tang Haibo4,Huang Peiyuan5ORCID,Wang Jie3,Deng Peizhi3,Li Yalan3,Zheng Jie567,Weng Liang89

Affiliation:

1. Health Management Center, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, China

2. Schools of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London , London, UK

3. Center of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, China

4. Department of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, China

5. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol , Bristol, UK

6. Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

7. Shanghai National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory for Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases of the National Health Commission of the PR China, Shanghai National Center for Translational Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

8. Department of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, China

9. Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, China

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite the established association between obesity and cancer risk, it remains unclear whether visceral obesity is causally related to cancer risk and whether it is more pro-oncogenic than total body fat. Methods We conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to assess the causal effects of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) on six common cancers. For exposure data, 221 genetic variants associated with the predicted volume of VAT in 325 153 Europeans from UK Biobank were used as instrumental variables. Genetic association data of six common cancers (breast, lung, colorectal, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancers) were obtained from large-scale consortia with an average of 19 576 cases and 43 272 controls. We performed univariable MR with five MR methods [inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median, MR-Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO) and Radial MR] and multivariable MR to estimate the effect of VAT independent of body mass index (BMI). Finally, we performed a series of sensitivity analyses as validation of primary MR results. Results Two associations survived the false discovery rate correction for multiple testing (q-value < 0.05): in IVW, the odds ratios (95% CIs) per unit increase in genetically determined VAT were 1.65 (1.03 to 2.62) for pancreatic cancer and 1.47 (1.20 to 1.82) for lung squamous-cell carcinoma, respectively, which showed the same directions and overlapped confidence intervals with MR-Egger regression and weighted median results. There were no outlier variants identified by MR-PRESSO and no evidence supporting the presence of heterogeneity and pleiotropy in sensitivity analyses, although with wider confidence intervals that included the null, multivariable MR results for these two cancers showed the same directions and similar effect sizes as in IVW, which were independent of the effect from BMI. There was no evidence for a causal effect of VAT on the risk of other types of cancer. Conclusion Our findings suggest that lifelong exposure to elevated volumes of VAT might increase the risk of pancreatic cancer and lung squamous-cell carcinoma, highlighting the importance of revealing the underlying mechanisms for intervention targets.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundations of China

Excellent Young Scholars

Outstanding Young Investigator of Hunan

Hunan Youth Talent Project

UK Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit

Academy of Medical Sciences

Wellcome Trust

Government Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

British Heart Foundation and Diabetes UK

University of Bristol

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine,Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3