Proton pump inhibitors and myocardial infarction: an application of active comparators in a self-controlled case series

Author:

Chui Celine S L123,Cheung Ka Shing45,Brown Jeremy P6ORCID,Douglas Ian J6,Wong Ian C K378,Chan Esther W37,Wong Angel Y S6

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong SAR, China

2. School of Public Health, University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong SAR, China

3. Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong Science and Technology Park , Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China

4. Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital , Hong Kong SAR, China

5. Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong SAR, China

6. Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London, UK

7. Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong SAR, China

8. Research Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy , University College London, London, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Previous studies investigating potential cardiovascular adverse events of acid-suppressing drugs are susceptible to protopathic bias and confounding. We aimed to investigate the association between short-term risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) using a self-controlled case series (SCCS) with an active comparator. Methods We conducted a SCCS using a population-wide database from Hong Kong from 2003–2014. Adult with ≥1 outpatient oral PPI prescription or H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) and MI during the observation period were included. We used both simple ratio and effect modifier approaches to SCCS with active comparators to obtain comparator adjusted estimates. Results A total of 2802 and 1889 people with MI who had exposure to PPIs and H2RA were included respectively. We observed a higher risk of MI during days 1–14 following the start of PPI prescription (Incidence rate ratio (IRR): 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.76–3.00) versus baseline. Similarly, we observed a higher risk of MI during days 1–14 following the start of H2RA prescription (IRR: 2.46, 95%CI: 1.92–3.16) versus baseline. In the novel SCCS analyses, comparator adjusted estimates were 0.93 (95%CI: 0.57–1.30) and 0.83 (95%CI: 0.58–1.20) during days 1–14 in simple ratio and effect modifier approach, respectively. Conclusions We observed no difference in risk of MI associated with PPIs compared with baseline using H2RA as the active comparator. The elevated risk of MI associated with PPIs is likely due to protopathic bias. More studies are required to explore the feasibility of using active comparators in SCCS to address protopathic bias in addition to confounding.

Funder

Innovation and Technology Commission

Food and Health Bureau of the Hong Kong Government, Hong Kong Research Grant Council

Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission, Pfizer

Research Grants Council

Research Fund Secretariat of the Food and Health Bureau

National Natural Science Fund of China

Wellcome Trust

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Hong Kong RGC

Hong Kong Health and Medical Research Fund

National Institute for Health Research in England

National Health and Medical Research Council in Australia

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine,Epidemiology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3