Affiliation:
1. Institute of Research on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council (CNR) , Campus Ecotekne, 73100 Lecce , Italy
2. Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena , Via Mattioli, 4, 53100, Siena , Italy
3. NBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center , 90133 Palermo , Italy
Abstract
Abstract
A continuous balance between costs and benefits dictates individual vigilance and foraging dynamics. In group-living animals, understanding the resulting trade-off is often complicated by multiple confounding effects. Vigilance and foraging levels may be the result of intrinsic (e.g., body size, trophic ecology, migratory phenology) and extrinsic (e.g., flock size, edge effect, group dynamism) factors, potentially differing between species, individuals, and contexts. We explored this idea by investigating intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing vigilance and foraging behavior of two sympatric gregarious bird species that differ markedly in body size and foraging strategies (Greylag Goose Anser anser and Common Crane Grus grus), during their non-breeding period. Interspecific differences were detected in activity allocation and in response to group-related variables. For both species, time spent in vigilance decreased with increasing flock size and with increasing distance from the edge of the group. While cranes allocated the resulting time to foraging, the same did not occur in geese. Changes in individual position in the group (i.e., peripheral vs. central or vice versa) elicited a prompt behavioral change (i.e., vigilance vs. foraging or other activity). Temporal changes in activity budgets were reported for geese but not for cranes, with a decrease of vigilance and an increase of foraging as winter progressed. Results allowed to disentangle the role of multifactorial determinants of vigilance and foraging, in turn increasing our understanding of underlying forces driving the evolution of behavioral traits and of group-living.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference86 articles.
1. Patch use in cranes: a field test of optimal foraging predictions;Alonso;Anim Behav,1995
2. How do vigilance and feeding by common cranes Grus grus depend on age, habitat, and flock size;Avilés;J Avian Biol,2007
3. EURING Eurasian-African Bird Migration Project. Report to the Convention of Migratory Species (CMS) on analysis of the current migration seasons of hunted species as of key concepts of article 7(4) of directive 79/409/EEC;Bairlein,2022
4. Gulls and Plovers