Introduction

Author:

van den Brink Martijn

Abstract

Abstract This introductory chapter examines the reasons for the indifference among legal scholars to the European Union (EU) legislative process. It illustrates, through a comparison of the EU Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, why it is important to place the legislature and the choices it makes central to our legal debates. And it explains what methodological approach to take in order to place it there. It explains, more specifically, that the proper allocation of EU legislative and judicial authority cannot be identified using doctrinal legal. Instead, it requires lawyers to exercise political judgement. Finally, the chapter outlines the book’s structure.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference456 articles.

1. ‘The Concept of Legalization’;International Organization,2000

2. ‘The European Court of Justice, More Than a Teleological Court’;Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3