Providing Explanations Shifts Preschoolers’ Metaphor Preferences

Author:

Zhu Rebecca,Goddu Mariel K,Gopnik Alison

Abstract

Abstract To learn from metaphors, children must not only understand metaphors, but also appreciate their informativeness. Metaphors based on abstract commonalities (e.g., functional metaphors like “Eyes are windows”) typically have greater potential to generate novel inferences, and thus generally allow for more learning, than metaphors based on more superficial commonalities (e.g., perceptual metaphors like “Eyes are buttons”). However, previous research shows that preschoolers prefer perceptual metaphors over functional metaphors. Consequently, we ask whether providing additional context can shift preschoolers’ and adults’ metaphor preferences. In Experiment 1, pedagogical context increases preferences for functional metaphors in adults, but not preschoolers. In Experiment 2, providing explanations for similarities between the concepts in metaphors increases preschoolers’ preferences for functional metaphors. In Experiment 3, preschoolers differentiate between functional and perceptual metaphors when explicitly asked to communicate functional or perceptual information. These findings suggest that providing explanations for metaphors helps preschoolers appreciate their informativeness.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference48 articles.

1. Comparisons within pairs promotes analogical abstraction in three-month-olds;Anderson;Cognition,2018

2. Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education

3. The development of metaphor comprehension and its relationship with relational verbal reasoning and executive function;Ballestrino;PLoS ONE,2016

4. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing;Benjamini;Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological),1995

5. The career of metaphor;Bowdle;Psychological Review,2005

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3