Dignity Beyond Price: Kant and His Revolutionary British Contemporary

Author:

Ameriks Karl1

Affiliation:

1. University of Notre Dame , Notre Dame, USA

Abstract

Abstract This chapter provides a comparison of the philosophies of Richard Price and Immanuel Kant. They were almost exact contemporaries and equally important in their respective cultures but apparently did not know of each other. Price’s outstanding achievements have been underappreciated ever since he was unfairly criticized by Edmund Burke. In their general moral theory, common respect for dignity, positive orientation to rationalism, and enlightened involvement in public issues, Price and Kant have a lot in common that is still relevant to contemporary philosophy. But whereas Price hailed the Glorious Revolution, the Declaration of Independence, and French Revolution, Kant only mentioned the French. Like Thomas Jefferson, they both asserted the self-evidence of human equality, and yet they did not explain how a doctrine could be presented both as revolutionary and self-evident. The chapter concludes with a discussion of self-evidence in the context of writings by Danielle Allen and other contemporary scholars.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference427 articles.

1. Moral Faith;Adams;The Journal of Philosophy,1995

2. Restorative Justice, Retributive Justice, and the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission;Allais;Philosophy and Public Affairs,2011

3. Kant’s Racism;Allais;Philosophical Papers,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3