Two Final Objections

Author:

Alter Torin

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter considers two final objections to the knowledge argument: one based on Quinean considerations; and one based on combining different objections. The Quinean strategy has versions that correspond to familiar strategies. The chapter argues that those versions face many of the same problems as their non-Quinean analogues, and that Quinean doctrines supply physicalists with no new resources for solving those problems. The chapter also argues that the prospects for hybrid strategies are poor. The hybrids that have been attempted have not proven any more viable than their component strategies, and there is no reason to think any alternative hybrid will fare better.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference432 articles.

1. Akins, K.  2001. More than mere coloring: A dialog between philosophy and neuroscience on the nature of spectral vision. In S. Fitzpatrick and J. T. Breur (eds.) Carving Our Destiny. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry: 77–114.

2. Mary’s new perspective.;Australasian Journal of Philosophy,1995

3. A limited defense of the knowledge argument.;Philosophical Studies,1998

4. Know-how, ability, and the ability hypothesis.;Theoria,2001

5. Nagel on imagination and physicalism.;Journal of Philosophical Research,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3