Realism and Progress in International Relations

Author:

James Patrick

Abstract

AbstractChapter 20 reflects on the project as a whole and gets underway with a review of specific accomplishments from Parts I–IV and Chapter 19. This final chapter assesses realism in an overall sense in light of an extensive graphic review of its theories in the context of the causes of war. Is realism a scientifically viable research enterprise? This question is answered affirmatively, but tentatively. Potential exists but remains unrealized for realism, which must meet rather than eschew scientific standards in order to move forward. Accomplishment of that goal through adoption of a systemist graphic approach to communication, in turn, would facilitate comparison to any other research enterprise that subsequently is identified in the same way as for realism within this volume. The chapter also offers several ideas about future research, and its final thoughts are on the prospects of realism as a scientific research enterprise.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference680 articles.

1. Global International Relations and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies.;International Studies Quarterly,2014

2. ALIAS. 2019. www.isanet.org/ISA/Sections/ALIAS.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3