Ultra ViresReview

Author:

Bobić Ana

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter analyses the case law of the Court of Justice and national constitutional courts concerning the question of competence monitoring. This issue represents the source of constitutional conflict and the underlying struggle in the relationship between the Court of Justice and national constitutional courts. Ultra vires review is primarily a structural question of the division of competences between the EU and the Member States. The case law under analysis is thus content-neutral, as the questions raised can result in both more or less integration. The analysis is structured in a chronological manner, and according to the theoretical framework outlined in Chapter 1. Accordingly, the analysis covers the introduction of direct effect and primacy, further expansions by the Court of Justice of the self-referential system of the Treaties in relation to EU external action, general principles of law, as well as rule of law and judicial independence. It also analyses national claims to ultra vires review, including their constructive or destructive nature.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3