Consciousness, the Human-Animal Foundational Distinction, and Ephemeral Connections to Humans

Author:

Evans John H.

Abstract

Abstract This chapter provides the results of the analysis of the public’s views. While bioethicists and scientists are primarily concerned that an organoid or a neuro-chimera could acquire increased consciousness, the public does not appear to be greatly concerned with consciousness. Rather, evidence shows that the public is principally concerned about violating the foundational distinction between humans and animals. In its strongest form, this concern produces not only opposition to chimeras but a disgust-driven backlash against them, with the public suggesting that they be treated worse than others of their species. This chapter also shows that the public does indeed believe in ephemeral connections to disembodied human parts like organoids, and that such belief is associated with opposition to creating organoids.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference187 articles.

1. Altman, Claire E. “Age, Period, and Cohort Effects.” In Encyclopedia of Migration, edited by Frank D. Bean and Susan K. Brown, 1–4. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2015.

2. A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects Who Fail a Manipulation Check.;Political Analysis,2019

3. Neural Blastocyst Complementation: A New Means to Study Brain Development in Mouse.;Stem Cells Portal,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3