The deliberative referendum

Author:

Hendriks Frank

Abstract

Abstract This chapter moves the investigation to real-life attempts to connect democratic innovations across the deliberative-plebiscitary divide, anchored in representative systems. This chapter concentrates on national-level practices, with special attention to the Irish ‘deliberative referendum’ on abortion that sequenced two strongly contrasting instruments: a deliberative mini-public and a binary referendum. Confronting this case with the values framework set out in Chapter 6, and with relevant mirror cases in other countries, the Irish process is understood as a comparatively successful case of hybrid democratic innovation (HDI), which helped to break a long-standing stalemate and navigate a cultural minefield. The mixed and balanced process catered to different values and audiences and was relatively well-integrated into the established system, amongst others compared to a similar process in Iceland.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference498 articles.

1. Ahmed, A., K. Rogers, and J. Ernst, How the Mighty Caravan Became a Trump Election Strategy, New York Times, <https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/24/world/americas/migrant-caravan-trump.html>, 24 October 2018.

2. Unmasking the Crowd: Participants’ Motivation Factors, Expectations, and Profile in a Crowdsourced Law Reform,;Information, Communication & Society,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3