Charles Darwin vs. Herbert Spencer on the Origins of Music

Author:

Piilonen Miriam

Abstract

Abstract Chapter 2 compares Darwin’s and Spencer’s competing evolutionary accounts of music, as articulated in texts such as Spencer’s “The Origin and Function of Music” (1857) or Darwin’s The Descent of Man (1871). Whereas Darwin understood music as an proto-language that emerges alongside instinctual urges for domination, conquest, and sexual reproduction, Spencer described music as an advanced province of the human species, which alone possesses the emotional “force” and “variation” necessary for musical expression. This chapter highlights finer points of agreement and disagreement between these two. If Darwin and Spencer had a debate, who was the winner? This chapter is interested in resisting the “Darwin-ization” of music-evolutionist history: the tendency to treat Darwin as the only relevant historical figure. Rather than adjudicate Spencer and Darwin’s musical debate, this chapter demonstrates that their positions were mutually constitutive, and that ultimately their differences dissolved into a shared position that opposes a more historicized view.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference297 articles.

1. Sound Object Lessons.;Journal of the American Musicological Society,2016

2. How We Got Out of Analysis, and How We Can Get Back In Again.;Music Analysis,2004

3. Agawu, Kofi. “Tonality as a Colonizing Force in Africa.” In Audible Empire: Musical Global Politics, Critique, edited by Ronald Radano and Tejumola Olaniyan, 334–356. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3