Abstract
Abstract
The first chapter begins with the critical observation that financial markets law is highly fragmented, which stands in striking tension with the reality of globalized financial markets. The author then presents the different options for financial service providers to access the European financial market. He points out that each of these ways is connected to decisive disadvantages. In particular, European rules are often applied extraterritorially, and third country financial service providers are forced to move to the EU (‘forced territoriality’), leading to legal market fragmentation. In the author’s view, the new approach of equivalence is one solution to this problem. The first chapter discusses the historical roots of equivalence, introduces the different regimes by setting out the areas of financial law covered by equivalence and examines the procedure for obtaining equivalence.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference630 articles.
1. FIDLEG—was kommt gemäss Botschaft des Bundesrates auf die Finanzdienstleister zu?;SJZ,2016
2. Jurisdiction in International Law;Brit Y B Intl L,1972
3. Albors-Llorens A, ‘Judicial Protection before the Court of Justice of the European Union’ in Barnard C and Peers S (eds), European Union Law (3rd edn, OUP 2020)
4. Transatlantic Financial Services Regulatory Dialogue;EBOR,2006