Author:
Batastini Ashley B.,Dvoskin Joel,Horton Jade,Cook Kaylee
Abstract
Abstract
The majority of published studies on correctional populations are in the context of prisons. As noted elsewhere in this book, while jails and prisons are often used as synonymous terms, their environments and populations can be quite distinct. Jails are inherently more difficult to study in a “clean” way, but more research on their unique needs and how best to address those needs is imperative. This chapter acknowledges these challenges and offers jail administrators and would-be jail researchers recommendations for improving the focus on empirical outcomes. Research can help jails and counties develop more sound polices for assessment, intervention, and reentry, as well as establish a foundation to advocate for additional resources (e.g., via state and county funding, external grant support). In addition to the importance of continued research and program evaluation, other recommendations for advocacy for jailed individuals and correctional and health care staff are provided.
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York
Reference61 articles.
1. Applying implementation research to improve community corrections: Making sure that “new” thing sticks!;Federal Probation,2011
2. Differential incarceration by race-ethnicity and mental health service status in the Los Angeles County Jail System.;Psychiatric Services,2020
3. C17P43Batastini, A. B., Hill, J. B., Repke, A., Gulledge, L. M., & Livengood, Z. K. (2018). Approaching correctional treatment from a programmatic standpoint: Risk-need-responsivity and beyond. In M. Ternes, P. R. Magaletta, & M. W. Patry (Eds.), The practice of correctional psychology (pp. 283–303). Springer.
4. Initiation of a multidisciplinary telemental health clinic for rural justice-involved populations: Rationale, recommendations, and lessons learned.;Journal of Community Psychology,,2020