Making

Author:

Herd David

Abstract

Abstract Chapter 4 shows why the right to work was crucial to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in its objective of countering expulsion. The right to work is contextualized via two extended considerations of work as a mode of belonging, from Arendt’s Human Condition and in Charles Olson’s poetics of labour. Contemporary commentators on Arendt, notably Jacques Rancière and Ayten Gündoğdu, are drawn on to show how the right to work is an expression of agency necessary to the politics of rights. The chapter concludes by addressing the arguments for work as human relation expressed in Fanon and Lefebvre. To understand mid-century regimes of expulsion and contemporary hostile environments, the chapter argues, it is necessary to understand the prohibition of work in terms of Lefebvre’s account of alienation. To be denied the right to work is to be denied the agency of making that constitutes participation in the human commons.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference242 articles.

1. Who Owns Frantz Fanon’s Legacy;Catalyst,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3