Conclusion

Author:

Benson Jonathan

Abstract

Abstract This conclusion provides an overview of the book’s epistemic justification of democracy and how it provides a robust response to the new democratic scepticism. It restates how the epistemic abilities of democracy are only produced through the interaction of many different institutions, and how they are therefore dependent on taking a systemic perspective. While any one democratic institution cannot possibly possess epistemic values superior to all of its alternatives, a systemic approach can identify divisions of labour and emergent properties which produce epistemic values at the system level. The conclusion also discusses the interdisciplinary nature of this systemic model and the ways it builds on the problems and critiques of the sceptics. It then ends by considering possible ways of improving the intelligence of contemporary democracies and discusses promising new developments, such as the increasing experimentation with more permanent and influential uses of sortition and random selection.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference398 articles.

1. Acemoglu, D., Naidu, S., Restrepo, P., & Robinson, J. A. (2015). Democracy, redistribution, and inequality. In A. B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2, pp. 1885–1966). Elsevier.

2. Akerlof, G. A. (1978). The market for ‘lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. In P. Diamond & M. Rothschild (Eds.), Uncertainty in economics (pp. 235–251). Elsevier.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3