Conclusion

Author:

Washington Anne L.

Abstract

AbstractThe unfathomable opportunities of the prediction supply chain need not be constrained by the demands of a few organizations. Procedural fairness, rule of law, justice, autonomy, or beneficence could be held with equal reverence as political, technical, or financial interests. With creative deviance, outliers rebuff limiting top-down speculations and instead rely on bottom-up data analytics. Liberation and transformation are equally as possible as domination and devastation. The conclusion looks to the past to reflect on data science’s potential. The history of the book shows that dissemination of knowledge can prevail despite commercial incentives to contain it. The freedom to learn, as practiced by librarians, offers lessons on rebalancing the power and information asymmetry. The final chapter argues that data analytics necessitates a broader approach to intellectual freedom. Communities that control their own digital representations illustrate the possibility of resistance and renewal through data science done differently.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference262 articles.

1. C7P43American Library Association. 2017. “ALA’s Code of Ethics.” May 19, 2017. https://www.ala.org/tools/ethics.

2. Bailey, Kenneth R. 2009. “The Other Brown v. Board of Education.” West Virginia History, New Series 3 (2): 53–73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43265122.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3