Author:
Heery Edmund,Hann Deborah,Nash David
Abstract
Abstract
This chapter describes the response of public authorities to the Living Wage. The first part of the chapter examines the extent of Living Wage accreditation amongst public sector organizations, demonstrates that the latter are particularly likely to adopt the Living Wage, and concludes that this is evidence of a continuing ‘good employer’ commitment. The chapter also identifies which types of public sector organizations are likely to adopt the Living Wage and shows that the latter is a characteristic of devolved governments and regional and local authorities, particularly where the latter are controlled by parties of the centre-left. The second part of the chapter reviews the steps that public authorities have taken to promote the Living Wage. Supporting authorities have no power to legislate for the Living Wage, but they have used non-legislative measures to promote the standard, including procurement, grant funding, wage subsidy, and funding the campaign itself.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference309 articles.
1. Widening the ‘representation gap’? The implications of the ‘lobbying act’ for worker representation in the UK;Industrial Relations Journal,2014
2. Paternalism and patronage;British Journal of Sociology,1976
3. On paternalism: seven observations on the use and abuse of the concept in industrial relations, past and present;Historical Studies in Industrial Relations,1998
4. Ackers, P. and Black, J. (1991). ‘Paternalist capitalism: an organization culture in transition’, in M. Cross and G. Payne (eds), Work and the Enterprise Culture. Falmer: British Sociological Association, 30–56.
5. Organizing migrant as workers or as migrant workers? Intersectionality, trade unions, and precarious work;International Journal of Human Resource Management,2013