The score: how do ratings correlate with politics and policy?

Author:

Barta Zsófia,Johnston Alison

Abstract

Abstract This chapter presents a quantitative analysis of the relationship between rating scores and politics and policy, mapping out the pattern of rating penalties and rewards on particular political and policy choices. This pattern is more consistent with the logic of insurance than with neoliberal orthodoxy. Ratings are significantly lower in the presence of generous entitlement systems, heavy personal income and consumption taxes, checks and balances and left and center governments. Spending on social services, public employment, and corporate taxation have either neutral or positive effects on ratings. The examination of the reaction of bond yields to the same variables demonstrates significant differences in how investors and rating agencies treat politics and policy, but rewards and penalties on certain political and policy choices enter into bond yields via ratings.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3