Abstract
AbstractIntergovernmental relations represent the second dimension of shared rule as defined in the introduction to this book. This chapter, Chapter 8, explores intergovernmental relations in foreign relations in the US, Canada, and Belgium. The next chapter, Chapter 9, turns to the EU. For each federation, the chapters start by briefly describing patterns of intergovernmental relations. In a second step, the chapters look at the constitutional rules and principles governing those patterns. The analysis reveals that in federal unions where political safeguards are weak, as in the US and Canada, intergovernmental relations are an important technique to manage shared rule. Belgium is an interesting case in this regard: formal political safeguards are strong in Belgium. Nonetheless, these strong political safeguards are supplemented with a highly formalized system of intergovernmental relations through which decision-making by consensus is imposed on all governments.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference482 articles.
1. Plenary Power Preemption;Virginia Law Review,2013
2. Adam MA, Bergeron J, Bonnard M, ‘Intergovernmental Relations in Canada: Competing Visions and Diverse Dynamics’ in J Prior, C Saunders, and J Kincaid (eds), Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems (OUP 2015)
3. Adler E, ‘Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions, and Debates’ in W Carlsnaes, T Risse, and B Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations (SAGE Publications Ltd 2013)
4. The Difficulty of Constitutional Amendment in Canada;Alberta Law Review,2016
5. The Integration of the European Development Funds into the MFF 2021–2027;European Parliament,2021