Abstract
AbstractThe evaluative categories (goodness, badness, betterness, and the like) and the deontic categories (requiredness, permittedness, forbiddenness, and the like) are separate families of normative categories, each with its own distinctive logic, structure, and basis. The aim of this chapter is to argue that there is a third family of normative categories beyond these familiar two, with its own special logic, structure, and basis, namely the fitting. This family includes properties and relations picked out by terms such as ‘fitting’, ‘apt’, ‘merited’, ‘warranted’, and ‘justified’, as well as certain adjectives ending in ‘-able’ (e.g. ‘admirable’), ‘-ing’ (e.g. ‘annoying’), ‘-ive’ (e.g. ‘persuasive’), ‘-some’ (e.g. ‘fearsome’), and ‘-worthy’ (e.g. ‘blameworthy’). Acknowledging the distinctiveness of fittingness as a type of normative category changes how we think about the foundations of ethics and other normative disciplines. Instead of asking, ‘Is the good prior to the right, or the right prior to the good?’ we should be asking, ‘What are the priority relations among the right, the good, and the fitting?’
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference48 articles.
1. Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions.;Philosophical Review,2013
2. The Unity of Grounding.;Mind,2018
3. The Explanatory Ambitions of Moral Principles.;Noûs,2019
Cited by
69 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Explaining Deontic Status by Good Reasoning;Erkenntnis;2024-09-12
2. Gratitude: Its Nature and Normativity;Philosophy Compass;2024-08
3. Debt and Desert;The Journal of Ethics;2024-07-29
4. Value, Fitting‐Attitude Account of;International Encyclopedia of Ethics;2024-06-03
5. Compendium;The Moral Universe;2024-05-30